A- de 2014
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla
✓Claimant Edith Johana Cerpa Salazar
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por cuanto no existió vulneración del debido proceso
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-491/11.
Las razones que justifican la solicitud tienen que ver con el desconocimiento de los derechos al debido proceso y el acceso a la administración de justicia.
También se cuestiona que la Sala de Revisión hubiese dado prioridad al principio de inmediatez sin analizar las circunstancias concretas del caso.
Luego del estudio de los motivos aducidos en la petición, la Sala Plena decide DENEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-491/11.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. DENEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-491 de 2011, proferida el 28 de junio de 2011 por la Sala Sexta de Revision de Tutelas.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.